Jan 10, 2012
In August 2011, each California redevelopment agency adopted an enforceable obligation payment schedule (the “EOPS”) listing all of the agency’s enforceable obligations (as defined in Section 34167(d) of the California Health and Safety Code) for payments required to...
Jan 5, 2012
As you know, on December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court delivered its decision in the California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos. The court upheld the constitutionality of AB1x 26, the bill dissolving redevelopment agencies, and declared...
Jan 5, 2012
On December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court delivered its decision in the California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos case, finding ABx1 26 (the “Dissolution Act”) constitutional and ABx1 27 (the “Alternative Redevelopment Program Act”) unconstitutional....
Dec 29, 2011
Today the California Supreme Court delivered its decision in the California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos case, finding AB1x 26 (the “Dissolution Act”) constitutional and AB1x 27 (the “Voluntary Redevelopment Program Act”) unconstitutional. Download the...
Dec 21, 2011
While the redevelopment community anxiously awaits the California Supreme Court’s decision regarding the constitutionality of ABx1 26 and 27 (the “Redevelopment Restructuring Acts”), two other independent redevelopment laws are slated to become effective on January 1,...
Sep 14, 2011
Does my agency really have to do that? When? and Why? These questions have come to pervade the minds of redevelopment agency staff throughout the State as a result of the adoption of AB x1 26 and AB x1 27, which fundamentally altered the activities and obligations of...