Jan 18, 2012
This analysis summarizes the California Supreme Court’s (the “Court”) decision announced on December 29, 2011, in theCalifornia Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos case (Part A), outlines the key provisions of AB x1 26 (the “Dissolution Act) that the Court found...
Jan 10, 2012
In August 2011, each California redevelopment agency adopted an enforceable obligation payment schedule (the “EOPS”) listing all of the agency’s enforceable obligations (as defined in Section 34167(d) of the California Health and Safety Code) for payments required to...
Jan 5, 2012
As you know, on December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court delivered its decision in the California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos. The court upheld the constitutionality of AB1x 26, the bill dissolving redevelopment agencies, and declared...
Jan 5, 2012
On December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court delivered its decision in the California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos case, finding ABx1 26 (the “Dissolution Act”) constitutional and ABx1 27 (the “Alternative Redevelopment Program Act”) unconstitutional....
Dec 29, 2011
Today the California Supreme Court delivered its decision in the California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos case, finding AB1x 26 (the “Dissolution Act”) constitutional and AB1x 27 (the “Voluntary Redevelopment Program Act”) unconstitutional. Download the...
Dec 21, 2011
While the redevelopment community anxiously awaits the California Supreme Court’s decision regarding the constitutionality of ABx1 26 and 27 (the “Redevelopment Restructuring Acts”), two other independent redevelopment laws are slated to become effective on January 1,...